NSC 4-A Secretly Authorizes CIA Covert Action Using "Fifth Function" Elastic Clause of 1947 Act

Opening

The National Security Council adopts NSC 4-A on December 17, 1947, formally authorizing CIA to conduct “covert psychological operations” abroad — the first operational authorization for what becomes CIA’s covert-action portfolio. The FRUS editors found no record of presidential approval of NSC 4-A; Truman approved the companion paper NSC 4 on December 18 (FRUS 1945-50 Intel, Doc. 257). The authorization cites the “Fifth Function” clause of the 1947-09-18–cia-founded-national-security-act-implementation — § 102(d)(5)’s language authorizing CIA to perform “such other functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the National Security Council may from time to time direct.” CIA General Counsel Lawrence Houston told the DCI in September 1947 that Congress had defeated a move to provide specifically for overseas collection, enacted Sections 102(d)(4) and (5) as a compromise, and had no thought that CIA would take “positive action for subversion and sabotage” (FRUS 1945-50 Intel, doc 241); NSC 4-A establishes it through executive directive five months later. The expansion via NSC 10/2 (June 18, 1948) adds paramilitary operations, economic warfare, and support for resistance movements to the authorized CIA portfolio.

What Happened / Key Facts

The “Fifth Function” clause:

• National Security Act of 1947, § 102(d): Listed four specific CIA functions (coordination, evaluation, dissemination, “performance of services of common concern”).
• § 102(d)(5): The open-ended fifth function — “such other functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the National Security Council may from time to time direct.”
• Drafting history: Per Houston (Sept. 25, 1947), a strong move to provide specifically for overseas collection was defeated and Sections 102(d)(4) and (5) were enacted as a compromise (FRUS 1945-50 Intel doc 241). No cited source places the fifth-function language in conference committee.

NSC 4-A (December 17, 1947):

• Psychological operations authorization: CIA directed to conduct “covert psychological operations designed to counteract Soviet and Soviet-inspired activities which constitute a threat to world peace and security or are designed to discredit and defeat the United States in its endeavors to promote world peace and security.”
• Operational scope: NSC 4-A directs the DCI “to initiate and conduct, within the limit of available funds, covert psychological operations” under Section 102(d)(5) (FRUS 1945-50 Intel, Doc. 257); a May 1948 State Department paper characterizes these as “covert psychological (propaganda) operations” (Doc. 274). Support for anti-communist elements abroad was added later, by NSC 10/2 (June 18, 1948).
• Immediate operational target: FRUS editorial material identifies NSC 4-A as the authorization for CIA intervention in Italy’s April 1948 elections; the directive itself does not mention Italy, and no cited source gives the earlier $10-20 million funding estimate.

NSC 10/2 (June 18, 1948):

• Expansion of authorities: Added “subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance movements, guerrillas and refugee liberation groups, and support of indigenous anti-communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”
• Office of Policy Coordination established (Frank Wisner, director) as formal CIA covert-operations directorate. OPC merged with Office of Special Operations in 1952 to form Directorate of Plans (later Directorate of Operations).
• Budget growth: CIA covert-operations budget grew from approximately $4.7 million in FY1949 to $82 million in FY1952 — 17-fold expansion in three years.

Why This Event Matters

NSC 4-A and its 1948 expansion establish the template for all subsequent CIA covert action:

• Executive-directive authority for operations Congress specifically rejected. Per Houston’s September 1947 memo, the defeated proposal concerned overseas intelligence collection; covert action was not considered. NSC 4-A’s December 1947 authorization is the paradigmatic case of executive-branch construction of authority after Congress declined to provide it. The pattern — Congress declines to authorize X, executive branch proceeds with X via internal directive — recurs throughout U.S. intelligence history: 1908-07-26–bureau-of-investigation-founded-doj Bureau founding, 1952-11-04–nsa-founded-by-classified-directive NSA founding, post-2001 warrantless surveillance authorization, 2025-2026 executive-order mechanisms implementing Project 2025 authorities Congress had not granted.
• Classification of authority itself. NSC 4-A was classified; so was NSC 10/2. The directives authorizing CIA’s operational portfolio were themselves kept secret from Congress, the public, and later even from White House senior staff. The fact of classified authorities grew over subsequent decades — the current intelligence-community special-access programs and presidential-finding system descend directly from the 1947-1948 secret-directive template.
• Elastic-clause legal architecture. NSC 4-A (Dec. 17, 1947) and NSC 10/2 (June 18, 1948) each cited Section 102(d)(5) as their authority for covert operations (FRUS 1945-50 Intel docs 253, 292). Since the Intelligence Authorization Act for FY1991, covert action has required a written presidential finding under a separate statute, 50 U.S.C. 3093. The Hughes-Ryan Amendment (1974) required congressional notification of covert action findings but did not alter the underlying elastic-clause authority.

Broader Context

The post-Watergate Hughes-Ryan Amendment (1974) and Intelligence Oversight Act (1980) introduced presidential-finding and notification requirements for covert action but left the underlying Fifth Function legal architecture intact. Covert action can still be authorized today through the same basic mechanism: NSC directive under § 102(d)(5), presidential finding in writing, notification to the Intelligence Committees (sometimes only the “Gang of Eight” leadership). The substantive authority derives from an elastic clause Congress specifically resisted in 1947.

Research Gaps

• Early post-NSC-4A operational planning documents partially declassified but substantial material remains classified

Related Entries

• 1947-07-26–national-security-act-creates-permanent-warfare-state
• 1947-09-18–cia-founded-national-security-act-implementation
• 1950-08-23–cia-acquires-civil-air-transport-proprietary-airline-template
• 1953-01-01–operation-mockingbird-cia-cultivates-journalists-media-capture
• 1953-08-19–cia-iran-coup-operation-ajax-overthrows-mosaddegh
• 1954-06-27–cia-guatemala-coup-operation-pbsuccess-overthrows-arbenz